Can someone asap daryl wrote the following proof to prove that alternate interior angles 3 and 5 are congruent. he made two errors in the proof. identify and correct the errors. steps statements justification 1. pq || rs by given2. angle 1 ≅ angle 3 by vertical angle postulate 3. angle 6 ≅ angle 8 by vertical angle postulate 4. angle 1 ≅ angle 8 by exterior angle postulate 5. angle 3 ≅ angle 5 by transitive property of equality

The errors are in steps 4 and 5. Step 4 would be that angle 1 is supplementary to angle 8, and step 5 would be that angles 3 and 5 are congruent because they are alternate interior angles.

x = 12

y = 15

step-by-step explanation:

x = 17

step-by-step explanation:

in the given figure, two triangles are inscribed in a circle where ∠bae ≅ ∠dae which makes the side be and de equal so we can write it as:

3x - 24 = x + 10

solving this equation for x to get:

3x - x = 10 + 24

2x = 34

x = 34/2

x = 17

therefore, the value of x = 17.