subject
Law, 07.02.2022 16:10 donnafranks2003

In small groups of 4–6 students, divide the group in half with half of the group representing The Haunted Witch Trials and the other half representing the liability insurance carrier for The Haunted Witch Trials. As the insurance carrier, you are trying to determine whether to continue to provide insurance coverage for the attraction at the end of its current policy year based on the risk of potential litigation against the attraction. Evaluate (1) the elements of any potential claim against The Haunted Witch Trials by Dmitry and Misha, (2) whether The Haunted Witch Trials may be liable for negligence (causing a greater financial risk to your insurance company), and (3) what potential damages might be awarded (if any) in this case. As The Haunted Witch Trials, you want to ensure that you can maintain coverage at a reasonable premium or else your entire operation will be shut down. Which of your business choices (involving the set up and operation of the attraction) do you think will be sufficient to defend against any liability claim and what changes should you consider making to improve your liability protection?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Per this theory, juvenile offenders learn to commit crimes through exposure to others. strain theory differential association theory neutralization theory social control theory none of the responses are correct. all of the responses are correct.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 05:20
How does henry’s statement reflect the idea of social contract? how does the idea of social contract protect people’s natural and individual rights
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 19:20
3. meena and ala are two friends. meena has a habit of using new pens almostevery day, whereas ala believes in getting a refill for her pen instead of buyinga new pen even though her friends make fun of her.a) which out of two practices would you follow and why? b) which value is ala depicting?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:20
Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In small groups of 4–6 students, divide the group in half with half of the group representing The Ha...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 03:30
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 03:30
Questions on the website: 13722367