Molly Weasley bought a Great Lakes spa from Mundungus, a dealer who was selling spas at the state fair. Weasley signed an installment contract.
Mundungus then handed her the manufacturer’s paperwork and arranged for the spa to be delivered and installed for her.
Three months later, Weasley left her six-year-old daughter, Ginny, alone in the spa.
While exploring the spa’s hydro massage jets, Ginny stuck her index finger into one of the jet holes and was unable to remove her finger from the jet.
Ginny yanked hard, injuring her finger, then panicked and screamed for help.
Molly was unable to remove Ginny's finger, and the local police and rescue team was called to assist.
After a three-hour operation that included draining the spa, sawing out a section of the spa’s plastic molding, and slicing the jet casing, Ginny's finger was freed.
Following this procedure, the spa was no longer functional.
Ginny was taken to the local emergency room, where she was told that a bone in her finger was broken in two places.

1) Under which theories of product liability can Weasley sue Mundungus to recover for Ginny's injuries?
2) Would privity of contract be required for Weasley to succeed in a product liability action against Great Lakes? Explain.
3) For an action in strict product liability against Great Lakes, what six requirements must Weasley meet?
4) What defenses to product liability might Mundungus or Great Lakes be able to assert?