3. How can you use this document to argue for or against the jury system?

Yes it can , from what I read. This defense case took place somewhere in India justifying the sanction of wild cows on farm lands while the owner of the land tried suing the city/jury office for unreasonable tresspass . The issue was of wild cows tresspassing on farming lands and ruining the till , in India this is acceptable because cows are religious/spiritual guides to Hindu-ism . The case was dropped on religious terms because you cannot rule Hindu IN India as unjustified. The cows are spiritual guides and can roam where they please.

NOW- in the USA you CANNOT rule religion/orientation as a first class defense justifying your acts (such as the cows running wild on private property) so this would NOT be able to be used to argue in the jury system. The cows would be poached or sent to farm lands.

Explanation:

In many places in present-day India,"wild" and stray cattle are serious problem to farmers. The sacred-cow concept contributes to a significant waste of beef and inefficiency in cattle breeding. Homes for old cows are basically religious institutions that divert funds from other needs of the nation.

answer: the only person who would no is god and you would no you would have to live with this scar for the rest of your life

explanation:

there is hope for you only if you ask forgiveness but if not you shall be guilty in the sight of god

answer:

the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977, as amended, 15 u.s.c. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. ("fcpa"), was enacted for the purpose of making it unlawful for certain classes of persons and entities to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business

explanation: