15. One reason dissenting opinions are significant to U. S. common law is that a. justices rarely want to write them, indicating that a justice might not vote the way he or she believes
in order to fall in the majority
b. they are usually written by the chief justice
c. they usually represent the opinions of the majority of the public, indicating that the Court regularly
ignores public opinion when making its rulings
d. they may have a lasting impact if the Court later changes its mind
e. they provide different reasons why a justice supported the majority ruling than was written in the
opinion

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.

answer:

that sucks

explanation:

answer:

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me. and that is just nasty!

explanation:

answer:

that is open to question, and different types of governments have certainly created a wide variety of rules. governments almost certainly originated with the need to protect people from many of which provided people with relief through jobs, payments, and food.

explanation: