Magine que o Presidente da República tenha sancionado um projeto de lei, vindo a promulgar e publicar a lei que aumentou a remuneração de servidores públicos federais de determinada categoria profissional. Tal projeto de lei foi iniciado por Senador da República que já havia prometido essa medida em campanha eleitoral. Após a entrada em vigor da lei, as entidades representativas dos servidores públicos festejaram o aumento. Diante disso, marque a alternativa correta. Leitura Avançada
(1 Ponto)

A Lei deve ser considerada constitucional, já que foram observadas todas as regras referentes ao processo legislativo.

A Lei deve ser considerada constitucional, pois eventual vício formal de iniciativa, ocorrido durante o processo legislativo, seria suprido pela sanção do Presidente da República.

A Lei deve ser declarada inconstitucional, pois compete privativamente à Câmara dos Deputados a iniciativa de lei para dispor sobre a criação e extinção dos cargos públicos federais, inclusive o aumento da remuneração.

A Lei deve ser declarada inconstitucional, uma vez que existe vício formal de iniciativa insanável, já que cabe ao Presidente da República iniciar projeto de lei que aumente a remuneração de servidor público.

A Lei deve ser considerada inconstitucional, pois além do vício formal de iniciativa, não sanável pela sanção do Presidente da República, o projeto de lei deveria ser iniciado na Câmara dos Deputados.

answer:

lol

explanation:

answer:

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me. and that is just nasty!

explanation:

Ohio State University--Columbus.

Brigham Young University--Hawaii.

Florida Memorial University.

Stanford University.

answer:

In the past the epithet "religion of peace and good will towards men" has been applied to Christianity.[1]

In the 1960s, Malcolm X, acting as a spokesman for the Nation of Islam, said on multiple occasions that Islam was a "religion of peace".[2][3]

In 1996, the Organisation of The Islamic Conference agreed to call for "pragmatic and constructive steps to counter the negative propaganda against Islam; to remove and rectify misunderstandings; and to present the true image of Islam: the religion of peace and tolerance."[4]

In September 2001, in the wake of the September 11 attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush said: "The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace. They represent evil and war."[5][6][7][8] Some have pointed out that the word "Islam" is etymologically related to the Arabic word salām meaning "peace".[9] This prompted criticism from some quarters[10] and a poll of United States Evangelical Protestant leaders taken in 2002 revealed that only 10% agreed with Bush that Islam was synonymous with peace.[11]

Mahathir bin Mohamad, the former Prime Minister of Malaysia said in 2002, "Islam, as I said, is a religion of peace. However through the centuries, deviations from the true teachings of Islam take place. And so [people who call themselves] "Muslims" kill despite the injunction of their religion against killing especially of innocent people.[12]

Dalil Boubakeur, mufti of the Paris Mosque, said in 2006, "The prophet did not found a terrorist religion, but a religion of peace."[13]

Following the 2015 San Bernardino attack, US President Barack Obama used the term, as part of his efforts to counter a perceived anti-Muslim bias, in an address following the attack,[14] and in his first visit to a US mosque.[15]

On March 18, 2016, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called Islam a religion of peace and called terrorism a dividing force, lauding the peaceful message of Sufism, at World Sufi Conference.[16]