Case 8 - Escobido v. Illinois, 378 U. S.478 (1964). Danny Escobedo's brother-in-law, Manuel, was shot and killed. The police arrested and interrogated Escobedo. Escobedo asked to speak to his attorney before he answered any questions. Even though his attorney was at police headquarters waiting to talk to him, the police did not allow him to. The police continued to question Escobedo without letting him talk to his lawyer, until he confessed to the shooting. His confession was used against him at his trial. He appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court, arguing that his confession was taken from him illegally.
Discussion Questions:
What part of the Fifth Amendment was involved?
How would the Supreme Court go about deciding the case (what would it consider)?
How do you think the Supreme Court should rule, and why?
Answers: 1
Law, 04.07.2019 02:20
The bon rules, located in title 22 of the texas administrative code, implement and reflect..
Answers: 2
Law, 11.07.2019 05:20
Vehicle #1 skidded 50 ft before impact with a drag factor of 0.80, how far from impact was vehicle #1 when vehicle #2 first began to accelerate from being stopped?
Answers: 2
Law, 15.07.2019 23:30
E 1. what are the ramifications of between loac and human rights law?
Answers: 2
Case 8 - Escobido v. Illinois, 378 U. S.478 (1964). Danny Escobedo's brother-in-law, Manuel, was sho...
Mathematics, 18.04.2020 02:03
Social Studies, 18.04.2020 02:03
Mathematics, 18.04.2020 02:03
English, 18.04.2020 02:03
Mathematics, 18.04.2020 02:03
Mathematics, 18.04.2020 02:03
Computers and Technology, 18.04.2020 02:03
Mathematics, 18.04.2020 02:03