A defendant was convicted of aggravated assault. His attorney appealed the conviction, and the first verdict was overturned based on the judge's finding that after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no reasonable fact finder could have voted to convict. The prosecution now seeks to retry the defendant for the same crime. The defendant's attorney objects to the retrial on double jeopardy grounds. Should the retrial be allowed

Which statement best explains why article iii of the constitution gives congress the ability to create lower courts inferior to the supreme court "from time to time”? a.the framers of the constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs. b.the framers of the constitution believed that as courts made unpopular decisions, they would need to be replaced. c.the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that congress always had more power than the courts. d.the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that new courts were always being created so new judges could be appointed.