subject
Law, 17.06.2021 16:20 aliyahlknox881

A homeowner was injured when an automatic cutoff switch failed to function on a snowblower he was using. The cutoff switch had functioned well for a year after he purchased the snowblower but failed after the machine had been improperly repaired by a mechanic. The snowblower’s operating manual contained a clear and prominent warning against making the same alteration to the switch mechanism made by the mechanic. The mechanic, however, did not have a manual available when he repaired the snowblower. Does the homeowner have a viable claim against the manufacturer of the snowblower for damages? a. No, because the homeowner was comparatively negligent in failing to furnish the snowblower’s manual to the mechanic. b. No, because the injury resulted from a substantial alteration of the snowblower by a third party. c. Yes, because a defect in the snowblower caused the homeowner’s injury. d. Yes, because the manufacturer should have made the manual available to repair personnel.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 20:40
Who is the official leader of the state?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 06.07.2019 08:10
What are the four components of a vehicles control system?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 08.07.2019 23:40
Which of the follow statements about drinking alcohol and driving is true
Answers: 1
question
Law, 09.07.2019 05:20
How does henry’s statement reflect the idea of social contract? how does the idea of social contract protect people’s natural and individual rights
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A homeowner was injured when an automatic cutoff switch failed to function on a snowblower he was us...
Questions
question
Arts, 12.01.2021 01:00
question
Social Studies, 12.01.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 01:00
question
English, 12.01.2021 01:00
question
Health, 12.01.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722367