subject
Law, 04.05.2021 23:50 edjiejwi

Which statement about the Miranda vs. Arizona case is false? a) Miranda warnings are required whenever a person is arrested.
b) Miranda warnings are required when custodial interrogation takes place.
c) The Miranda vs. Arizona case is based in the 5th amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
d) The Miranda vs. Arizona case is still a valid legal precedent.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 18:10
What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 10.07.2019 07:10
Which of the following is a polynomial with roots 3,5i, and -5if(x)=x^3-3x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-25f(x)=x^3-15x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-75
Answers: 2
question
Law, 12.07.2019 10:10
What is the most common reason people do not vote?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 13.07.2019 16:10
If you plan to exit an expressway after a short period of time, you should drive in a . a. left lane b. center lane c. right lane
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which statement about the Miranda vs. Arizona case is false? a) Miranda warnings are required when...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 21:20
question
Chemistry, 25.01.2021 21:20
question
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 21:20
question
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 21:20
question
History, 25.01.2021 21:20
Questions on the website: 13722367