PLS HELP ME :( I WILL GIVE U A BRAINLIEST. MY CLASS IS ENDING SOON! If witness statements about a homicide contradict autopsy findings, what should police do next? Would you be more likely to believe a witness or the findings of a forensic pathologist who performs an autopsy?
What might be especially satisfying about a career in forensic pathology? What might be difficult about the work?

If the statements of witnesses and the autopsy report contradict each other the police should investigate everything again properly. First check to see if the witnesses are the criminals and also check of the autopsy was wrong. I believe an autopsy to be more accurate since people might think or see one thing but it is something else. But at the same time the witnesses claims can help the officers find out the original cause (if there are no lies or if they weren't mistaken about what they saw or heard). The thing that might be especially satisfying about a career in forensic pathology is about what you can find out (just as autopsy reports) and just how much you've wanted to do it (the career in forensic pathology). The difficult part about is that one thing can make a very BIG difference and that determining the cause might be hard. All together it varies from person to person, some might find it straining, while some do not, THIS IS ABOUT ALL JOBS NOT JUST FORENSIC PATHOLOGY -I hope this helps!

Please do keep in mind that this is just my personal opinion.

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.

answer:

,jejjejejejejjeje