Tying It Together (WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND ALL THE POINTS I HAVE) Write a paragraph explaining the result of the trial. ( “Mr. and Mrs. Smith v. Auburn Bunston Dealership.”)

Be sure to include:

-the verdict.

-the most important evidence.

BACKGROUND INFO: MRS SMITH SAID THEY WERE BEIG CHEATED BY BOB THE SALESMAN, AND THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT WAS JUST A MISTAKE.

Read explanation vv

Explanation:

MAKE SURE TO ADD OR FIX anything you believe is essential to the case to support Mr/Mrs's. Smith's claims.

Name: Mrs. Smith

Verdict: Innocent

Summary:

Mr/Mrs’s Smith consulted with Bob, the salesman at the dealership. Mrs. Smith has claimed that she has been cheated by Bob. The dealership claims that it was a mistake.

Conclusion: Is there any evidence or proof of these accusations? Speak with the dealership and ask for records, files, etc., about the claimed, “cheat” executed by Bob. Without any concrete evidence, there is no way to prosecute. I believe that the verdict is innocent.

The jury reached a unanimous verdict. We decided the dealership intentionally deceived the plaintiffs. The most important piece of evidence that led us to this decision was the surveillance video.

Explanation:

This is a simple response

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

yeah sometimes i dont know why maybe cuhz something is bothering you