Pros and cons of placing term limits on supreme court justices?

Explanation:

Pros:

1. Judges Of All Ages Might Be Nominated. With term limits, age wouldn't be such an issue and named justices could even have more experience.

2. It also, will avoid the nomination  judges working beyond 80's,beyond the point of being able to do the job.

3. No Politically Motivated Retirements

Cons:

1.term limits could change the way the public thinks about the court, making them connect it more with elections rather than seeing it as independent.

2. More Money & Lack Of Independence.

3. Real problem is not addressed. One activist judge passing the baton to another does not create a check on judicial activism

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

answer:

b species

explanation: