Why is Jeremy Banks’ profession a complication in this case? Why do Michelle’s family and friends think that Jeremy may have ended her?
Why do the police feel that Michelle committed not living?
What led to the case being reopened?
What did testing of the evidence show that raised questions?
Why did the state decide not to pursue the situation as turn off life rather than not living?
Why is domestic violence by law enforcement not reported more often? Why are law enforcement perpetrators less likely to be held accountable for their actions?

Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.