Choose one or both of the Supreme Court cases and determine whether you believe the decisions handed down in these were in agreement with the truths of the Bible. Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

cluck cluck?   plz give me brainlest xd

in order to appeal you must be able to show why the mark or classification you are appealing against is unfair, or does not represent your true academic ability. you believe your degree classification was not calculated correctly. a procedural problem over the way an exam or assessment was conducted or marked.

The doctrine of stare decisis means that courts look to past, similar issues to guide their decisions. The past decisions are known as precedent. Precedent is a legal principle or rule that is created by a court decision. This decision becomes an example, or authority, for judges deciding similar issues later.

Explanation: