subject
Law, 15.07.2020 02:01 andyboy336747

A defendant was tearing up a stretch of pavement with a jackhammer when a rock flew up and struck a plaintiff in the head, causing him to be hospitalized. Because the jackhammer manufacturer had been out of business for several years, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for his medical costs, lost work time, and pain and suffering solely against the defendant. At trial, the plaintiff's attorney calls a witness who testifies that, at the time of the incident, the defendant stated, "It was my fault." The defense attorney objects, but the judge overrules the objection on the ground that this is a declaration against interest. Are the grounds for the judge's decision correct?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 04.07.2019 09:10
How can an environmental law affect a business
Answers: 1
question
Law, 08.07.2019 06:10
How has naturalization made an impact or change in society, government, and the political process?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 10.07.2019 01:20
In recent years, there have been two major criticisms of congress and how it promotes the public good. describe these two in two paragraphs
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 15:10
If you can't get enough sleep, you should a. close your eyes when stopped in traffic b. not drive, period c. drink extra coffee before you drive d. leave earlier so you can drive slower
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A defendant was tearing up a stretch of pavement with a jackhammer when a rock flew up and struck a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2019 13:30
Questions on the website: 13722367