Juror #3 was easily the most vocal proponent of the defendant's guilt. When he
was left as the only juror voting "guilty", he tried to hold his ground, but he
eventually broke down in a gut-wrenching scene at the end of the film. It
transpired that he was holding on to the idea that the defendant was guilty
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary because of a deep resentment
he was harboring against a different person altogether. Who was Juror #3 really
angry with?
O
Juror #8
O
His son
O
His father
O
The defendant's mother

Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb.

Traffic signals at expressway on-ramps use lights.

Quid pro quo sexual harassment typically involves