A suspect is involved in an automobile accident and is properly arrested for drunk driving. The police take the suspect to a hospital and a doctor draws a blood sample without the suspect’s consent or a warrant. Blood alcohol content evidence is admitted against the defendant at trial. What did the U. S. Supreme Court decide in Schmerber v. California (1966), about the admissibility of this procedure?

37 i just had the same problem

answer:

no

explanation:

donald trump shouldn’t be impeached. if the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false. anything else would give the president the power to distort democracy by calling his opponents criminals without ever having to prove it .for more than a few reasons, more and more americans are beginning to support the impeachment of donald trump or at the very least believe he will be impeached eventually. short of trump trying to establish himself as king, i think impeachment is a very bad idea. i cant believe you democrats' would throw shade on him for reasons that you dont even have proof of. ugh. liberals.

answer:

caughty