Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today?

(a) hair samples are replacing dna as an easily available, go-to source for identifying suspects.

(b) modern changes in the discipline mean that any police officer can provide testimony on hair samples.

(c) hair samples are necessary for most convictions.

(d) there's solid research that should lead us to be skeptical of testimony based on hair samples.

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.

answer:

b. tell a trusted adult

explanation:

most reasonable¯\_(ツ)_/¯(^.^)/~~~

answer:   idk sorry

explanation:

answer: pokemon

explanation: