Scott fane was a cpa licensed to practice in new jersey and florida. he built his new jersy practice by making unsolicited phone calls to executives. when he moved to florida, the board of accountancy there prohibited him (and all cpas) from personally soliciting new business. fane sued.1.does the first amendment force florida to forgo foreclosing fane's phoning? argument for fane : the florida regulation violates the first amendment, which protects commercial speech. fane was not saying anything false or misleading, but was just trying to secure business. this is an unreasonable regulation, designed to keep newcomers out of the marketplace and maintain steady business and high prices for established cpas. argument for florida board of accountancy: commercial speech deserves and gets a lower lever of protection than other speech. this regulation is a reasonable method of ensuring that the level of cpa work in our state remains high. cpas who personally solicit clients and obviously in need of business. they are more likely to bend legal and ethical rules to obtain clients and keep them happy, and will lower the standards throughout the state. a texas law banning flag buring was rejected be the supreme court, as was louisiana death penalty statute. the affordable healthcare act has been voided by two lower court judeges, and the supreme court may or may not agree with the action.2.do you lie the fact that courts can void laws that they determine to be in violation of the constitution? or is it wrong for appointed judges to overrule "the will of the majority," as expressed by elected members of congress and state legislatures? 3.do you agree/disagree with the holding of ewing v. california? why or why not? 4. of the selected crimes committed by business, which do you believe has the most adverse impact upon society and why?