Aserver at a restaurant believed that he was a victim of racial discrimination. he filed a discrimination charge with the eeoc in october 2005. for reasons that are unclear, neither the employee nor the eeoc took any other action regarding the case until october 2011, when the eeoc finally issued a right to sue letter. a lawsuit was filed in december 2011. the employer argued that the case should be dismissed because the lengthy (six-year) delay and the employee’s failure to prompt the eeoc to take action sooner unfairly disadvantaged the defense. should the court allow this case to proceed under these circumstances? why or why not?

Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.