Asister and brother inherited property that consisted primarily of a meadow as tenants in common. the sister received a one-third interest in the property; the brother received a two-thirds interest. the sister grazed sheep in the meadow. once a year, she sheared the sheep and sold their wool. her brother, who lived in a distant city, never visited the meadow or made any attempt to make use of it. upon learning of his sister's use of the meadow, the brother demanded that his sister pay him rent for her use of the meadow and a share of the profits she made from selling the wool of the sheep that grazed there. when she refused, he filed suit against her. for whom should the court rule? answers: a. the sister, because the siblings did not hold the meadow as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. b. the sister, because she had the right to use the meadow and earn profits from her use of it. c. the brother, because he held the majority interest in the meadow. d. the brother, because his sister made exclusive use of the meadow.