Justices practice judicial restraint when they

Justices practice judicial restraint when they make narrow decisions that only relate to a specific case.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a principle of separation of powers that must be taken into account in judicial decision-making.

According to this principle, the case law should not answer or anticipate questions that fall within the original area of legislative or executive power (legal activism). These should not be answered and made binding by the highest courts, but rather by the constitutionally provided and legitimized bodies such as Congress or the federal government.

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.

answer:

beatch hahaha i love hentia

explanation:

hahahahahahahahahahaga