What was the biggest area of disagreement between martin luther king, jr. and malcolm x?

The biggest area of disagreement between Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X was about the type of actions that African Americans should take in their protests. Martin Luther King Jr believed in nonviolent actions, while Malcolm X had a more radical and combative stance.

Explanation:

-Martin Luther King Jr., was an American activist who developed a crucial work in the United States at the head of the civil rights movement for African Americans and who also participated as an activist in numerous protests against the Vietnam War and poverty in general. For this activity aimed at ending US segregation and racial discrimination through non-violent means, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964.

-Malcolm X was an African American speaker, religious minister and activist. He was an advocate for the rights of African Americans, a man who harshly accused white Americans of their crimes against their black compatriots, while his detractors accused him of preaching racism and violence. He was one of the most influential African-Americans in American history. Member of the Nation of Islam, he supported direct African-American action as a means of defense against racial segregation.

new evidence is discovered.

oversights and errors are corrected,

new technology is applied to evidence.

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)