How do the presidential roles of chief of state and commander in chief differ? a. the chief of state role is defined in the constitution, while the commander in chief role is unwritten. b. the commander in chief role deals with legislative issues, while the chief of state role deals with executive issues. c. the chief of state role involves only domestic policies, while the commander in chief role involves only foreign policy. d. the commander in chief role addresses major problems, while the chief of state role is mostly symbolic.

D. The commander in chief role addresses major problems, while the chief of state role is mostly symbolic.

Explanation:

The roles of commander in chief and chief of state are significantly different. The commander in chief is the ultimate authority of all United States Armed Forces. This enables him to make important decisions during times of crises, although the specific level of this power has varied throughout history. On the other hand, the chief of state role is mostly a symbolic position. It identifies the President as the head of the government and symbol of all the people.

the outcome of 1970 oil crisis in united states was that, they began to search ways on how to reduce oil.

in 1970 was a period when there were energy and oil crisis. those who were major centers for industrialization were forced to keep way from supplying of petroleum.

some of the result of this crisis was economic growth became stagnant because prices of oil surged.

due to the increased prices some countries like mexico and norway benefited.

that is probably something for you to answer