subject
History, 13.11.2019 05:31 rosepotato789

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian?

a. they can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone. b. they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. c. they can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period. d. they can a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
Summarize the effects of the marshall plan on the us and western european countries
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:20
When conducting research for forming a hypothesis, which practice should historians follow?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which of the following is true about a merger? a. it is an example of deregulation. c. it is a combination of two or more companies into a single firm. b. it violates the sherman anti-trust act of 1890. d. it always leads to economic growth.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What explains the increase in life expectancy in botswana? a. the increased availability of jobs and an improved economy b. access to antiretroviral drugs, hiv/aids education, and widespread hiv/aids testing c. a series of military takeovers that stabilized the political system and led to education reform and increased literacy rates d. a recent military coup that led to an improved healthcare system select the best answer from the choices provided.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a hist...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.01.2022 06:30
question
Mathematics, 24.01.2022 06:30
question
Mathematics, 24.01.2022 06:40
Questions on the website: 13722363