subject
History, 25.07.2019 15:30 jfrjtwrg

In what case was it determined that the president cannot use his commander in chief status to seize domestic property during war in a foreign land? a. youngstown sheet and tube co. v. sawyer b. jones v. clinton c. united states v. nixon d. brown v. board of education e. hamdi v. rumsfeld

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:30
How do citizens perspectives differ
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:40
Select the five weaknesses of the articles of confederation. congress could not declare war or establish an army. congress could not levy taxes. congress could not control trade. not all the states were represented in congress. no national court system. no executive to enforce the laws. congress could not negotiate with foreign governments. the national government could not borrow money. nine of the states had to agree to pass a law.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Plz which of the following provisions of the compromise of 1850 was designed to appeal to slave states? a. congress passed a strict fugitive slave law. b. the slave trade was banned in washington dc. c. texas agreed to give away some of its land so that the territory would be available for future states. d. california was admitted to the union as a free state.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
How did the gutenberg press directly influence the reformation
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In what case was it determined that the president cannot use his commander in chief status to seize...
Questions
question
Physics, 05.12.2019 21:31
Questions on the website: 13722361