Egypt’s recorded history began around 10,000 bc with the old kingdom (1). egyptians had developed a means of writing called hieroglyphics (3). hieroglyphics used pictographs to convey meaning (3). which critiques the factual accuracy of the summary?

The correct answer is B) while parts 2 and 3 are accurate, part one needs revision.

What critiques the factual accuracy of the summary is that while parts 2 and 3 are accurate, part one needs revision.

Historians considered that the formal settlement of people in the Egyptian territory started in 6000 BCE. But hieroglyph script developed around 3200 BCE. So Egypt’s recorded history did not begin around 10,000 BC with the Old Kingdom but around 3200 BCE. The statements that are true are "Egyptians had developed a means of writing called hieroglyphics" and "Hieroglyphics used pictographs to convey meaning." So parts 2 and 3 are accurate, part one needs revision.

The other options of the question were A) while part 1 is accurate, part 2 and 3 need revision, C) while parts 1 and 2 are accurate, part 3 needs revision. And D) while part 3 is accurate, parts 1 and 2 need revision.

you aint got nothin on my lil weenies