How does justice black defend and explain his decision in the dissent for tinker v. des moines?

Justice Black stated that the First Amendment does not protect the students from giving their opinion at any time because the use of armbands distracted the students from performing their work.

Explanation:

The Tinker V. Des Moines was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court about the freedom of speech granted in the First Amendment of the Constitution.

The case involved five students of Iowa who decided to wear a black armband to show their protests against the Vietnam War. The school decided to create police against the student´s decision that stated that any student using an armband will be suspended if they refuse to remove it.

The majority decision delivered by Abe Fortas stated that the school decision violates the students´ freedom of speech right supported by the First Amendment.

I hope this answer helps you.

gaius cassius longinus and marcus junius brutus, former enemies of julius caesar who'd joined the roman senate, led caesar's assassination, dubbing themselves "the liberators." and the second one is   the assassination of julius caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many roman senators led by gaius cassius longinus, decimus junius brutus albinus, and marcus junius brutus. they stabbed caesar (23 times) to death in a location adjacent to the theatre of pompey on the ides of march 15 march 44 bc.

b.provides a written record of the transaction