"their world, quite literally, changed before the indians' eyes as european colonists transformed the forest into farmland. . in the southeast, hogs ran wild. sheep and goats became permanent parts of the economy and culture of pueblo and navajo peoples in the southwest. horses transformed the lives and cultures of indian peoples on the plains. europeans also bought honey bees, black rats, cats, and cockroaches to america." — colin g. calloway, historian, first peoples: a documentary survey of american indian history, 2012 which excerpt does it describe

explanation:

nutelal

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.