When looking at the feudal system, which is a notable difference between japanese samurai and european knights? japanese samurai were not considered part of the higher class. european knights were not part of the military. japanese samurai were highly educated. european knights were highly qualified government leaders.

The correct answer is Option C) Japanese Samurai were highly educated.

Samurai's were a military nobility class in medieval Japan and they remained relevant uptil the 18th century.

While, similar to knights, they enjoyed a seperate, elevated social status in the society, they were at times even more powerful than their European counterparts.

Samurai's were also educated and unlike Knights, were seen as intellgient political influences in Japanese history. In fact, the Samurai class was able to control and rule of Japan for a couple of centuries.

there are two main types of historical sources: primary sources and secondary sources. a primary source is something that originates from the past. it can be a chronicle, a piece of pottery, or even a piece of glacial ice that gives us climate data about the levels of atmospheric carbon one thousand years ago.

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.