Why did factory owners and management often use force against striking workers? a) they wanted to protect their families in case of worker uprisings. b) they wanted to show that they were tough enough to run dangerous factories. c) they hoped the use of force would keep the government from getting involved. d) they hoped the use of force would keep workers from joining unions in the future.

D) They hoped the use of force would keep workers from joining unions in the future.

Explanation:

Strikes became regular amid the Industrial Revolution when mass work ended up significant in factories and mines. In many nations, strike activities were rapidly made illicit, as processing plant proprietors had definitely more power than laborers. Most Western nations in part authorized striking in the late nineteenth or mid twentieth hundreds of years.

sorry i do not know this

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!