History, 29.10.2019 18:31 zakyiaiarvis544
1978: in regents of the university of california v. bakke, the supreme court rules that schools setting aside a number of slots to admit minority students violates the equal protection clause.1996: in united states v. virginia, the supreme court rules that a military school must provide women with equal treatment by admitting them to the same program as men.2015: in obergefell v. hodges, the supreme court rules that state laws forbidding same-sex marriage violate the equal protection clause.
what do the events in this timeline suggest about how the supreme court has interpreted equal protection?
a. it has interpreted equal protection in ways that expand the rights of minorities but not of women.
b. it has interpreted equal protection as less important in the 21st century.
c. it has interpreted equal protection as applying at the federal level, not at the state level.
d. it has interpreted equal protection in ways that expand civil rights for minorities and women and ways that limit programs intended to benefit minorities.
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 16:30
How did william penn come on possession of land in the new world
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
How is the principle of states rights reflected in the declaration or the articles of confederation
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which principle means that government is bound by the rule of law
Answers: 1
1978: in regents of the university of california v. bakke, the supreme court rules that schools set...
Geography, 08.10.2019 05:30
Business, 08.10.2019 05:30
Biology, 08.10.2019 05:30
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 05:30
History, 08.10.2019 05:30
History, 08.10.2019 05:30
English, 08.10.2019 05:30
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 05:30
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 05:30
English, 08.10.2019 05:30
Social Studies, 08.10.2019 05:30
Business, 08.10.2019 05:30
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 05:30
History, 08.10.2019 05:30