Question text jake was recently arrested for vagrancy after a policeman found him sleeping in a public park. after a month, jake still has not been brought in front of a judge to hear the charges against him. which of jake's rights listed below have been violated in this scenario? select one: a. habeas corpus b. peaceable assembly c. free speech d. ex post facto

The correct answer is A. Habeas corpus

Explanation:

In law and related fields, Habeas corpus refers to a principle that establishes all individuals that are arrested should be taken to a judge to guarantee their detention is lawful which means there are reasons or evidence that the individual committed and crime and the process of detention follow the law. In the same way, an individual might be released in the case the habeas corpus principle is not followed.

In the case of Jake, habeas corpus has been violated because despite he was arrested, he has not been brought in front of a judge that guarantees the detention was lawful, and Jake committed a crime or offense which is part of Habeas corpus principle.

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

read more on -

explanation: