subject
History, 13.10.2019 23:50 lilyforeman5867

Which of the following parts of the historian's argument is a piece of historical evidence?
a. "based on these points, he argues that the french revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones."
b. "in his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals."
c. "he points to the execution of the french royalty and the european wars the revolutionaries launched following their victory to support this point."
d. "he notes that, following the revolution, a rash of violence swept over france."

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:00
Sea exploration became important during the late middle ages because europeans most likely wanted to
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
How did richelieu intend to strengthen the monarchy of france
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:40
Who was in charge of american troops during world war i?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Hich answer supports the statement, "the state constitution is more detailed than the u.s. constitution"? a) the u.s. constitution was created after state constitutions had been established. b) the u.s. constitution only exists because the state constitutions allowed it to be created. c) the articles in the state constitution do not deal with amendments like the u.s. constitution does. d) the articles in the state constitution deal with more specific issues than does the u.s. constitution.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following parts of the historian's argument is a piece of historical evidence?
a...
Questions
question
Biology, 03.07.2019 01:30
question
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 01:30
question
Social Studies, 03.07.2019 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722361