subject
History, 12.07.2019 07:40 khamyah96

How did the "rule of reason," supported by william howard taft, differ from theodore roosevelt's new nationalism? a: the new nationalism would allow trusts to squeeze out smaller businesses while the "rule of thumb" would not. b: the new nationalism would weaken the hard line set by the sherman antitrust act while the "rule of reason" would strengthen it. c: the new nationalism would back stronger government power to bust trusts while the "rule of reason" would weaken that power. d: the new nationalism would seek government control over telephone and telegraph rates while the "rule of reason" would not.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:30
Japan became a peaceful democratic nation relativlt quickly after the end of world war 2. which step was not part of its post-war transformation? a. giving the emperor more political power.b. adopting a new constitution.c. giving women the right to vote.d. disarming most of the military.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
In 150-200 words, name three advancements made by the egyptians and tell how they impacted the culture.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Which of the following is not a requirement to become a us representative (congressman/congresswoman)?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Nationalist movements in the ottoman empire resulted in
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did the "rule of reason," supported by william howard taft, differ from theodore roosevelt's new...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2020 22:28
question
SAT, 20.04.2020 22:28
Questions on the website: 13722362