History, 08.07.2019 11:40 tsvijay121

If you had to choose sides, would you side with the federalists or anti-federalists? explain why you sided with the particular group by summarizing, in your own words, their arguments.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Debates over the ratification of US constitution started in 1787. Those who supported the constitution were called Federalists, and those who didn't were called Anti Federalists.

Both Federalists and Anti Federalists wanted to preserve liberty, the disagreement between them were about the Federal Govt. Anti-Federalists were afraid that a strong national govt will destroy liberty. The Federalists believed that the National government was necessary to create a perfect union. They believed that the national republic would safeguard individual liberties and minority rights from the infringement of a majority. Sovereignty and structure of the state were also important for them and hence they suggested for a strong central government, which would share powers with the states.

Today if we analyze the functioning of the US government it is clear that the way union has existed for over a hundred years was only possible because of the constitution and strong federal govt. So I would like to have supported the Federalists because they were in favor of the Principle of government by consent and strong federal govt.

Answer from: Quest

explanation:

japan participated in world war i from 1914 to 1918 in an alliance with entente powers and played an important role in securing the sea lanes in the west pacific and indian oceans against the imperial german navy as the member of the allies.

Answer from: Quest

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 16:00

What similarity can be drawn between state and national governments?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 20:00

If the united states became a "majority-minority” nation, o whites would be the majority, but there would still be ethnic minorities. there would be an equal number of whites and ethnic minorities. othere would be more ethnic minorities in the population than whites. o no one would be considered white or part of an ethnic minority group.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 23:00

What are two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings? a.it established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role.b.it states that the english monarchy was a position that parliament delegated.c. it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament.d.it established that the people of england has the right to choose the monarch.e.it abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the church of england.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:30

Monopolies were legal in the united states until a)the 1860s. b)the 1870s. c)the 1880s. d)the 1890s.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

If you had to choose sides, would you side with the federalists or anti-federalists? explain why yo...

Questions