Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v. alvarado? write a short paragraph describing your answer and connect the case to the miranda v. arizona decision.

No, the Supreme Court’s majority ruling should not be accepted.

Alvarado who was a minor and under police custody was stated not official by the state's court. However, the Supreme court overturned this order and said that the minor was arrested by the police for interviewing Miranda's case.

However, the minor believed that he was in custody and would have confessed under pressure. Hence, Miranda rights give permission to suspect to be silent if suspected by the police.

It is similar to Miranda v. Arizona as there also perpetrator was not considered official in the police custody when the records of confession stated.

Therefore, made the court reject the order that the detained minor is a criminal as no attorney rights were provided before the police investigation.

Learn more about Yarborough v.Alvarado here:

link

affirmative action refers to the policies that take gender, race, or ethnicity into account in order to promote equal opportunity.

employers subject to title vii are prohibited from taking race or sex into account in any employment decisions. aa is a penalty for having any job group substantially statistically "underutilized" in any race or either sex. the employer must take steps to eliminate the underutilization, then stop, ending its aa efforts

i believe it is capitalists.