Ahistorian evaluating "for the equal rights amendment” would most likely consider this source to be unreliable because it presents only one side of an issue. reliable because it presents the point of view of an expert. fair because it presents different sides of an issue. biased because it addresses both sides of a controversy.

The best answer for this statement would be:

fair because it presents different sides of an issue.

A historian would look for both sides of the story, since it’s profession involves extensive research and reading carefully on each point of view. 

Just took the quiz on edge and the answer is "reliable because it presents the point of view of an expert."

the answer is states.

1. darius the great     persia  

2. piankhi       nubia

3. ezana       aksum

4.     nebuchadnezzar     babylonia

5. shalmaneser iii     assyria