What was the difference between the supreme court decisions in sweatt v. painter and brown v. board of education? sweatt ruled that “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools were constitutional. brown overturned that decision. sweatt struck down “separate but equal” public schools. brown struck down “separate but equal” graduate schools. sweatt struck down “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools. brown struck down “separate but equal” public schools. sweatt concerned african american voting rights. brown concerned equal access to education for african americans.

"Sweatt struck down “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools. Brown struck down “separate but equal” public schools" is the best bet, since the Brown V. Board of Ed decision was more expansive and overturned Plessy V. Ferguson

Explanation:

Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that with success challenged the "separate however equal" philosophy of separatism established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The case was influential within the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later.

The difference between the Supreme Court decisions in Sweatt v. Painter and Brown v. Board of Education was that Sweatt struck down “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools. Brown struck down “separate but equal” public schools.

Further Explanations:

“Brown versus Board of Education” case of the Supreme Court alarmed about the racial discrimination encountered by black students of America. The presiding of the case was the cornerstone for the “Civil Rights Movement”. Court ruled “separate but equal School” for both white and black students maltreating the 14th amendment and supporting racial segregation.

“Sweatt versus Painter” case of the United State was a landmark case that challenged the “Separate but Equal” dogma of racial discrimination recognized as per the ruling of the “Plessey versus Ferguson” case of 1896. The incident took place as a black American Herman Marion Sweatt was not admitted to the School of Law, University of Texas. His admittance was rejected by Theophilus Painter, President of the University on the ground of incorporated education.  

Learn More

Answer details

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Brown versus Board of Education

Keywords:

Brown, Board of Education, Supreme Court, United States, Civil, Sweatt versus Painter, Separate but Equal, Plessey versus Ferguson, Herman Marion Sweatt, School of Law, University of Texas,

1) the andrew carniage's purchase and renovation of skibo castle have been very good and auspicious for the local people of dornoch firth, scotland because this is a turistic attraction for many people who would want to know the castle, the local people would take advantage about this.

2) yes, it could.