Read the excerpt from the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson. that petitioner was a citizen of the united states and a resident of the state of louisiana, of mixed descent . . on june 7, 1892, he engaged and paid for a first class passage on the east louisiana railway . . and thereupon entered a passenger train, and took possession of a vacant seat in a coach where passengers of the white race were accommodated; that such railroad company was incorporated by the laws of louisiana as a common carrier, and was not authorized to distinguish between citizens according to their race. but, notwithstanding this, petitioner was required by the conductor, under penalty of ejection from said train and imprisonment, to vacate said coach and occupy another seat in a coach assigned by said company for persons not of the white race. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether localities have the authority to label individuals by race. the brown case addresses whether the laws of southern states are racially biased. the brown case addresses whether penalties and punishments can legally vary by race. the brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law.

The correct answer is: "The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law".

Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1954 which declared segregation in public facilities to be unconstitutional and the principle of "separate but equal" that was accepted in  Plessy v. Ferguson was not accepted anymore. In this former case, under the "separate but equal" lemma it was declared that segregation was not discriminatory, and hence did not violate the provision of the equality of rights for all US citizens included in the 14th amendment to the US Constitution, as long as the separate facilities for white and black people were equal in quality. This previous decision was overturn for good in Brown v. Board of Education.

Explanation:

It relates with it since it was about racial segregation. Plessy v Ferguson set up that segregation was something worth being thankful for in light of the fact that the general population were equivalent despite the fact that they were isolated.

Brown v Board of instruction built up that isolation was unlawful and nullified the Plessy v Ferguson precept which implies that the case in the portrayal was additionally an illegal demonstration of segregation.

this is not a question its simply asking you to read and write a few sentences and   the question on the bottom its fairly easy, you can do this!

ayatollah khomeini can best be described as the leader who declared iran to be an islamic republic.