Read the excerpts from "opening statements from John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon First Televised Debate." Kennedy: I'm not satisfied until every American enjoys his full constitutional rights. If a Negro baby is born--and this is true also of Puerto Ricans and Mexicans in some of our cities--he has about one-half as much chance to get through high school as a white baby.

Nixon: We are for programs that will expand educational opportunities, that will give to all Americans their equal chance for education, for all of the things which are necessary and dear to the hearts of our people.

Which statement best compares Nixon's and Kennedy's positions on educational opportunity?

Question 1 options:

A. Both claim they wish to expand educational opportunity, but Kennedy offers more explanation about which populations he would like to specifically target with expansion programs.

B. Both claim that they would like to expand educational opportunities, but Nixon is much more specific about the populations he would like to address with expansion programs.

C. Kennedy wishes to expand educational opportunities for minorities, while Nixon argues that doing so will require unnecessary government interference.

D. Kennedy wishes to expand the educational needs of minorities, while Nixon is much more focused on helping these individuals achieve financial stability.

the correct answer is: the fact that the anti-federalist papers were considered poorly written.

if you're talking about (ww2) they went bankrupt and their currency was worth nothing

explanation:

naturalization is the process of gaining united states citizenship. becoming an american citizen is the ultimate goal for many immigrants, but very few people are aware that the requirements for naturalization have been over 200 years in the making.

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.