HELP__For this assignment you will not be able to provide just the place in the Constitution that refers to the numbers below. Give the location, and then your 2 examples. You must write in complete sentences. Writing Activity 5: Examine the Constitution of the United States. In a labeled word document, identify 2 examples for each constitutional property:
• sets limits on the government
• denies absolute or arbitrary power
• applies to the government specifically
• enumerates particular powers the government has and denies all others
• is written as the supreme law of the land
• cannot be changed by the government itself

1. Sets limits on the government: Think about the separation of powers between the federal and state government

2. Denies absolute or arbitrary power: Think about the separation of powers within the three branches of government. For example, he president has control of the military, but not the military budget. That is the duty of Congress, and therefore it would be hard for the president to control the military with no money or funds therefore "checking" the president's power to act arbitrarily with the power and might of the US military. What other ways limit or check power?

3. Applies to the government specifically

4. Enumerates particular powers the government has and denies all other: Check out Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.

5. Is written as the supreme law of the land: Our Constitution is the "supreme law of the land" Check out Article VI Section 2. You can choose examples from the Bill of Rights

6. Cannot be changed by the government itself: The US government, and for example the president, cannot just randomly change laws. Check out Article V

the correct answer is:

b) a rich merchant.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answer: representation of human experiences

explanation:

hello,

what started the norman conquest?

profound political, administrative, and social changes in the british isles. last line of my information: )