Review this quote from the decision in Marbury v. Madison. It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.

How does this excerpt summarize the case?

It explains why the Supreme Court ruled in favor of William Marbury in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
It explains that the Supreme Court should decide whether a law or action is constitutional.
It explains why the judicial department ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was constitutional.
It explains that the judicial department has powers that go beyond the limits of the Constitution.

KATIE DELETING MY QUESTIONS I WILL BE REPORTING YOU

The government gives public funds to low-performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multi denominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools