one of the con arguments states that the economy won't suffer if copyright law is eliminated. The argument is that when someone is given a shared file rather than spending money to buy it, the money isn't lost to the economy; it’s simply redirected to buy something else, such as the pizza. Is this a fair argument? Why or why not?

i think it would be reparing roads  

the correct answer is d

the answer is jerusalem

booker t. washington was an educator who established the tuskegee institute. washington argued that african americans should learn trades that would offer them the opportunity to be progressive citizens. instead of fighting against discrimination, washington argued that african americans should use their education and knowledge to become self-sufficient in american society and not in competition with white americans.

w.e.b du bois was the founder of the niagara movement and later the naacp, du bois disagreed with washington. he argued that african americans should consistently fight for racial equality.

ida b. wells was a journalist who wrote about the horrors of lynching in the south. wells work could be considered muckraking as it led to the development of the anti-lynching campaign.