subject
History, 12.09.2021 07:50 kobiemajak

The constitutionality of this act is attacked upon the ground that it conflicts both with the 13th amendment of the Constitution, abolishing slavery, and the 14th amendment, which prohibits certain restrictive legislation on the part of the states. 1. That it does not conflict with the 13th amendment, which abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, is too clear for argument. . . .

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:10
Sole i will mark brainlist to who answer
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
Briefs filed by groups that care about how a case turns out?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
John locke viewed the social contract as a choice or "consent of the governed", where the people possess the power to change government. how did thomas hobbes see the social contract? man is born in chains, but can be set free through good deeds. man is born happy, but becomes more miserable as he ages. man is born poor, but can rely on other individuals for security. man is born selfish, but can give up some freedom in return for security provided by the government.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 17:00
Why did marx believe all workers would unite? communism
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The constitutionality of this act is attacked upon the ground that it conflicts both with the 13th a...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 10.11.2021 20:40
question
Mathematics, 10.11.2021 20:40
question
Chemistry, 10.11.2021 20:40
Questions on the website: 13722363