subject
History, 09.09.2021 20:50 aliveajones2005

St. Louis William
doubled
Thomas Jefferson
fifteen
eighteen
In 1803, the Louisiana Territory encompassed what is now at least part of drag and drop answer hete states in the United States. At the time, it was
property of France, but Napoleon Bonaparte realized that his country could not control such a vast expanse of land. Thanks in part to a slave revolt in
their colony of drag and drop answer here France looked for a solution to their potential Louisiana problem. At the same time in the Untied States,
President drag and drop answer here hoped to secure the U. S.'s possession of the city of drag and drop answer here at the mouth of the
drag and drop answer here with access to the Gulf of Mexico. The U. S. was prepared to offer France drag and drop answer hete for the city, but instead,
France sold the entire Louisiana Territory for that amount. The U. S. quickly agreed, and in a a matter of weeks the U. S. more than
drag and drop answer here in land area.
To better evaluate what his country had just purchased, the President sent explorers drag and drop answer here Lewis, drag and drop answer here Clark,
and their Corps of Discovery to explore the great expanse of the newly purchased land. Setting out westward from the city of
drag and drop answer here the Corps of discovery traveled mostly on the drag and drop answer here though Nebraska, the Dakotas, and other present
day states. Lewis & Clark reached the drag and drop answet here in November of 1805, stayed there for the winter, and set out on their return trip the
following March. They were able to retrace their route and return to drag and drop answer here by late September of 1806.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Step 1 - choose only one of the two options. • in a word document, create an " action plan" to move the bus stop pick - up/ drop - off point to a new location. • in a word document, create an " action plan" to have road signs and speed limits installed at this location. (step 2) in a word document, draft a letter that explains why you are taking this action. you may use fictitious data as long as it is reasonably believable. (step 3) in a word document, create a petition that voters can sign to go along with your letter of explanation. (step 4) in a word document, explain how you would implement this action plan to all voters affected by your action plan. ( there's much territory to cover.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:50
Which of the following statements is true about water access in the middle east? a. access to coastal waters is not important to people.b. most countries depend on outside resources for water.c. water is available in large supplies in all countries.d. all countries have sources of renewable freshwater.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Why did the second indochina war start in 1956
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
St. Louis William
doubled
Thomas Jefferson
fifteen
eighteen
In 1803,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.01.2020 05:31
question
Mathematics, 23.01.2020 05:31
Questions on the website: 13722363