What happened between the war of america and japan?

the have many loss soldier

Explanation:

It was one of the bloodiest conflicts that America engaged in.

It is really hard to give you a decent summary. However, here are the main points.

You have to start with China. The Japanese used 1 million army regulars to occupy China. That effectively took them out of the conflict between America and Japan.

Second. Pearl Harbor. Against his better judgement, Admiral Yamamoto engineered the attack on Pearl Harbor. It was primarily a Naval attack if you absent the fact that Japan's Navy carried the planes within striking distance. It remained a mostly naval war until the end. The Americans respected Yamamoto so much that when they broke the Japanese code, a massive attack was waged against the fleet commanded by Admiral Yamamoto. Little known fact. That happened in April 18, 1943

Third. Midway. Midway was probably the decisive battle in the Pacific. There was lots of fighting that took place afterward, but there was no way Japan could make up for the carrier losses at midway. She just could not match the industrial strength of the United States. Japan had already awoken the sleeping giant, as Yamamoto phrased it.

This is the beginning of your understanding. I have left out the land battles that took place mainly fought by the marines. The Philippines the Mariannas Okinawa are all things you should look up along with Douglas MacArthur and Charles Nimitz. I might recommend Doolittle's raid on Tokyo as well.

explanation:

ad the excerpt and i will gladly answer

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]