Could the use of the atomic bomb have been avoided and, if so, at what cost? What was the long-term impact of the decisions of the United States, Britain, Germany, Soviet Union, and other countries to include targets with civilians in their war strategy (e. G., Berlin, London, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki)?

The use of the atomic bomb could have been avoided but the consequences would have been disastrous for American and Allied operations in Japan due to the projected immense losses due to Operation Downfall (the planned invasion of Japan, if it was not for the atomic bombs).

 The long term impacts was that Japan immediately surrendered to the the collapse of vital infrastructure. For Berlin, the impacts were the same-total surrender to demoralization and widespread destruction.

Explanation:

*Pretty much, if the atomic bombs were not used, then the Allies would have won, although with more caualties, and the war could have dragged on

mesopotamian code of hammurabi

and i think its 1860 b.c. you mean lol

the answer that best explains what happened to george washington at fort necessity, pennsylvania is : washington was attacked by the french but was able to negotiate with them to peacefully end fighting. the battle took place on july 3, 1754. the battle is considered as being the start of the french and indian war.