Then, use the information you have learned from the article and throughout the lesson to complete this charting activity. Three topics are provided; you can include up to two more of interest. Include informed opinion about how and whether the changes occurring in the South represented successes or failures in Reconstruction. Then, write an editorial evaluating progress (or lack thereof). Be sure your editorial is clear in its stance, and cite specific examples to support your opinion.

Following are the response to the given question:

Explanation:

Economy:

However, as the economics of northeastern states, reconstruction intended to leave the economy of the heat Sources without the use of slaves. The concept was certainly very lovely, but the way this was developed did not happen. In the first years of rebuilding, the states in the south endured heavy economic repression and although they were able to recover the economy with time, they rarely achieved whatever the northern countries present.

Politics:

This rebuilding tried to limit Southern's democratic engagement, had no beneficial outcomes as there was a southern American regime with times of abuse of power and indifference of North leaders who thought it essential to punish Southern. Furthermore, the standards and regs in the area stimulated racism and systemic racism, which show that the reconstruction program could not accomplish its objectives.

Education:

The goal was that classrooms would be built in the south such that people would have complete access to education. Nevertheless, there are still no projects showing the necessity of building schools, although the structures were being built by the people in the north. Such schools were spurned by Southerners and demolished by their youngsters for concern that the northern ideals were contaminated, and so this tactic for the restoration of a South failed once again.

Editorial:

While the rebuilding purpose was positive, it can be said that it was not performed efficiently. This because rehabilitation did not diminish the rejection and disdain of northern people. This issue should be debated during the reconstruction. The absence of dialogue about this subject means the public reject the rebuilding techniques proposed by the government and all the plans failed.

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.

the virginia plan called for three branches of government and two houses of congress. representation in each house would be determined by population. the new jersey plan called for three branches of government and a single house of congress. each state would have an equal vote.